Koran burner Derek Fenton fired from his job at NJ Transit (NY Daily News)

Sep 15 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections

NY Daily News : Koran burner Derek Fenton fired from his job at NJ Transit

No responses yet

King: Imam behind Ground Zero-area mosque ‘blackmailing’ U.S. on project (Bridget Johnson/The Hill)

Sep 11 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections

Bridget Johnson / The Hill : King: Imam behind Ground Zero-area mosque ‘blackmailing’ U.S. on project

No responses yet

9/11: Nine years turns a resolved, united America into a bunch of politically correct pansy asses

Sep 11 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections

Tina Trimble Belliston The anniversary of 9/11 is always a very emotional time for me, as it is for the entire country. Nine years ago today, the most horrific terror attack in the history of our country took place. It plunged an unsuspecting city into panic and set the entire nation reeling from shock. We were absolutely paralyzed that day, and I, like so many of my fellow Americans, still weep at its remembrance. So many of us lost family, friends, and loved ones – as did people from more than 70 countries around the world. What the hell happened? The impact of 9/11 wasn’t just felt here at home. The aftershocks were felt around the globe. Most of us can remember exactly where we were that day, what we were doing, and what we were feeling with amazing clarity. So much is now happening in our nation that would have seemed inconceivable just nine years ago, and I think I’m safe in saying that much of it has our collective heads spinning. I do not believe for one fleeting second that, on September 12, 2001, there would have even been a shred of discussion about whether a mosque two blocks from Ground Zero would be “appropriate”. It was a time in our nation when we weren’t Republicans and Democrats, or blacks and whites and Hispanics and Asians, or this religion or that one. Instead, we were Americans. We wept together, we prayed together. We felt fear, horror and shock together. No partisan lines, no racial divides. Just one nation united by tragedy. It is my firm belief that the answer from that American collective to such a question, had it been asked then, would not have been just a no, but a loud and resounding “Hell no!” So what happened in the span of nine years to change that?  Political correctness. Now obviously, lest I be accused of ineptitude by the small minds of those who like to feign intellectualism by slapping together a string of musty, multi-syllabic words interspersed with a peppering of insults – or, in other words, those who would twist my words to imply that I naively believe political correctness only arrived on the scene recently – political correctness is nothing new. (Wow. Nobody can construct a run-on sentence quite like I can. Do you need to take a breath after that one? I do. But I digress.) While it certainly isn’t anything new, it seems to me that political correctness has gone absolutely feral in our society these days. Rearing its ugly head and snaking its way into our minds, it is running amok and striking unnecessary fear into the hearts of the American people, paralyzing so many in the face of what would are deemed “sensitive” issues. In our current society, “sensitive” seems to have become code-word for the fact that if you disagree on said “sensitive” issues you’re going to be labeled racist/bigot/islamophobe/insert-your-own-label-here. Political correctness has many people tip-toeing around the subject of the Ground Zero mosque, many so immersed in fear of offending someone by speaking out that they’ll instead squelch their own feelings, forgetting what they felt on 9/11 – what the overwhelming majority of us felt on 9/11 – the lives lost and the panic struck, in order to spare someone else’s feelings. But here’s a newsflash – having an opinion on this subject does not make you a radical/racist/islamophobe/wingnut/insert-your-own-label-here. For those who spout off that Americans are “overreacting” in regard to this issue, here’s a thought. Tolerance, you cry?  Compassion? Sensitivity?  Freedom of speech?  Well, a little turn of phrase comes to mind: It’s a two-way street. Yeah. That applies here. Demanding that a person tolerate something they find hurtful and offensive does nothing more than facilitate intolerance. Why does it seem that, in regard to this issue, tolerance, sensitivity and freedom of speech are, instead of a two-way street, a one-way street?  Hypocrites. Where does your demand for tolerance and compassion end and mine begin? l No regard is being given to those who will feel the sting from this project the most.  Instead, it seems all the regard is given to those who will stubbornly move forward with the mosque regardless of what message it sends in the minds of the American people. In fact, did you know that you’re a radical? Well, to be fair, 7 out of 10 of you currently reading this would be considered radical, based on recent polls. Don’t want to paint with too broad a brush, you know. Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf has implied that 70 percent of Americans are radicals with respect to the Ground Zero mosque project. In his own words, “If we move from that location, the story will be that the radicals have taken over the discourse.” Yesiree, Bob: You’re a radical, I’m a radical, she’s a radical, he’s a radical too! Kind of has a ring to it, don’t you think? So, if you oppose the mosque at Ground Zero based on the premise that you feel it’s insensitive, you’re a radical. But it apparently is not radical for the Cordoba Initiative to display insensitivity by forging ahead with a plan that flies in the face of the wishes of the overwhelming majority of Americans. Don’t you just love those pesky little double standards? They seem to rear their smarmy little heads so very often these days. Let’s be honest here. If this issue truly had anything to do with sensitivity, tolerance, compassion, understanding, seeds of peace and all those other feel-good terms people like to toss around, then the Cordoba Initiative would step away from this plan and relocate their project. Instead, apparently we are to be more concerned with the notion, in Rauf’s own words, that “the headlines in the Muslim world will be that Islam is under attack,” than we are with the will of the American people. Where is the sensitivity on the part of Islam that is so frequently demanded of us as a nation? Tolerance? Compassion? Understanding? Yeah, there’s that pesky little turn of phrase again: It’s a two-way street. And that other pesky term – double standard. Furthermore, can anyone point me to a time when Islam isn’t claiming that it’s under attack? That it’s been offended? That we aren’t being tolerant enough? Speaking of enough, when is enough finally, well, enough? Flag burnings, Bible desecration, persecution of non-Muslims, and even persecution of Muslims who aren’t apparently Muslim enough, are commonplace in the Middle East. Yet we are to find no intolerance, no hate, no bigotry in those actions? Man, those pesky little terms just keep popping up – double standards, two-way streets, and hypocrisy. And yes, for those pseudo-intellectuals who are frothing at the mouth about now, I do realize that the Middle East is not the United States. D’oh! Hypocrisy and double standards still abound. When they can scream all the way from the Middle East and demand tolerance here for their actions there, we can scream right back from the U.S. and demand the same. What does it say about the state of our world when the pastor of the obscure Dove World Outreach Center in Florida, with a tiny congregation of 50, suggests burning Korans on the anniversary of 9/11 and receives more worldwide media coverage than Glenn Beck’s Restoring Honor Rally that drew a crowd of 500,000 did? Further to the point, what does it say about the “religion of peace” when they apparently find burning the U.S. flag, desecrating the Christian Bible and persecution of non-Muslims to be perfectly acceptable, yet the mere mention that a few Korans might be burned on the anniversary of 9/11 is enough to cause Muslim radicals the world over to threaten violence?  That the idea of moving the Ground Zero mosque a few blocks further away is enough to cause them to claim that Islam is under attack? What does it say about the state of our nation that the mere hint of burning a few Korans causes our leaders to speak out about the harm that will be done to our relations with Islam? Why is Bible desecration, flag-burning and persecution of non-Muslims by Muslims perfectly acceptable and not to be taken in to account in regard to the impact they may have Islam’s relations with the West, but speaking out against the mosque at Ground Zero makes 70 percent of Americans radicals? I, for one, am sick to death of the appeasement, the demands of tolerance and sensitivity made by hypocrites who refuse to reciprocate the very things they so indignantly stipulate to us. The same people who would use political correctness to subjugate us, and use the very freedoms so many have fought and died to preserve in order to strangle us. Religion of peace and tolerance?  My lily white arse. The holocaust was 60 years ago, and already there are those who claim it never happened. The attacks of 9/11 happened nine years ago today, and already we are being told that we “overreacted”. How long until 9/11 “never happened”? Never forget, America. Never forget.

See the original post:
9/11: Nine years turns a resolved, united America into a bunch of politically correct pansy asses

No responses yet

Religious Tit for Tat

Sep 10 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections

Put me down for almost LIKING what the vile Pastor in Florida, Rev. Terry Jones tried to do. He IS a nut-job.  A truly disgusting individual, but within his Constitutional rights.  (I think of the comical Neo-Nazis in “The Blues Brothers” who had the right to march, holding up the Blues Brother’s quest and certainly not winning any popularity award.  “I hate Illinois Nazis!”) This Pastor is calling to attention Liberal hypocrisy… not that that’s some extraordinary feat.  NYC Mayor Bloomberg, not a so-called liberal, but certainly acting hypocritical and rightfully called the Koran burning “distasteful,” yet oddly championed the Ground Zero Mosque or the politically benign term “Park 51″.  (Sounds like a place to bring the kids and have ice cream.  Now THAT’S not distasteful.) BOTH are legal acts.  BOTH can’t be stopped.  But BOTH are vile demonstrations.  BOTH call into question the underlying message’s significance.  Thus BOTH need condemnation by the representative religion and Constitution supporters. What say you?

See the rest here:
Religious Tit for Tat

No responses yet

Red Eye: Florida Church to Qur’an- “Burn, Baby, Burn!”

Sep 10 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections

Only nuts in FL ever burned anything in protest. Oh, right… The latest edition of “ Red Eye ” brought together host Greg Gutfeld with Imogen Lloyd Webber , Stephen Kruiser and Joe DeRosa . As always, TV’s Andy Levy and faithful sidekick, Bill Schulz , rounded out the show. The hot topic of the evening was the plan by a small Florida church to burn copies of the holy book of Islam on September, 11, to mark the ninth anniversary of the terrorist attacks on US territory. As Gutfeld pointed out, the current American dialectic on this issue seems to be “sure, legally they can burn the Qur’an, but that doesn’t mean it’s right.” Gutfeld has heard this argument before , somewhere. …that mostly everyone agrees the pastor can burn the book, but he’s a big weenie if he does it. This was exactly  my argument over the construction of the [Ground Zero] mosque. So in a weird way, this guy may have clued in others who missed that subtle point: The mosque can be built, but a compromise (or a conversation about it) might have been nice. Don’t get me wrong: the Koran burning is pure provocation, and I’m not sure that’s entirely the case with the mosque. But both issues deal with poor judgment. The key distinction: the pastor is a total barfpuck. The difference is, the people making this argument against the Ground Zero Mosque are “intolerant, Islam-fearing bigots,” whereas the people making the argument against burning the Qur’an are high-minded intellectuals. A bigger difference? Building the mosque doesn’t entail the threat of a violent Muslim backlash. See, Terry Jones is a total creep. Small “L” Libertarian blogger, Beregond, ties the man and his church to Westboro Baptist, of Fred Phelps fame . But reactionary Muslims are also creeps, and those threatening violence in the streets of Kabul, or around the world, based on the actions of a very few are exactly the type of radically violent extremists the Left constantly claims it hates, but secretly admires. There’s no doubt burning someone’s religious doctrines will be seen as offensive by people of that faith, but how much violent Muslim backlash do we need to put up with before we put our foots down? “South Park” depicts Mohammed: threats of violent Muslim backlash. Everybody Draw Mohammed Day: threats of violent Muslim backlash. Cartoons of Mohammed in European newspapers: actually violent Muslim backlash. Sell liquor in Russia: violent Muslim backlash. See a pattern? We’re constantly being told we shouldn’t fear Islam, but always under the threat of terror and death. In essence, it’s bigotry to consider Muslims violent, and if you say they are, they might get offended and kill you. Is it any wonder Feisal Rauf now fears moving the Ground Zero Mosque would provoke violence by Muslim extremists and threaten national security ? For someone so concerned about improving the image of his faith, he sure seems to be counting on a large group of Muslims acting exactly like the “bigots” claim they will. I think I have a solution. To the book burning issue, at least. Instead of burning the Qur’an, which is a definite provocation, let’s burn effigies of bin Laden , Ahmadinejad and ad-Gaddafi. Since these men are terrorists, I’m sure moderate Muslims will flood the streets of Gainesville in support. We all hate terror, after all. Those Muslims who threaten a violent backlash against anyone who hates terrorists prove only that they sympathize with extremist jihadist actions and are therefore hardly to be considered moderate. Burning the Qur’an is a stupid move, but so is promoting worldwide terrorism by actively supporting the idea we should change our behavior because it might upset some Muslims and, therefore, death . Islam can’t both be a religion of peace and the deadly, gloved hand reaching out to throttle us in our sleep. While I don’t support Terry Jones, or his planned Qur’an burning, maybe it is time the West helped Islam decide which it really is.

More:
Red Eye: Florida Church to Qur’an- “Burn, Baby, Burn!”

No responses yet

Colin Powell Says Ground Zero Mosque Should Go Forward (Patricia Murphy/Politics Daily)

Sep 09 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections

Patricia Murphy / Politics Daily : Colin Powell Says Ground Zero Mosque Should Go Forward

No responses yet

Koran Burning Is Insensitive, Unnecessary; Pastor Jones, Please Stand Down (Sarah Palin/Facebook)

Sep 08 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections

Sarah Palin / Facebook : Koran Burning Is Insensitive, Unnecessary; Pastor Jones, Please Stand Down

No responses yet

Clarification

Sep 05 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections

In a comment thread regarding the Ground Zero mosque , Fishboy feigns ignorance: I’m still bemused – no-one seems to be able to say *why* it’s poor taste. Fishboy – let me take a stab at this: They’re building a Muslim house of worship at a site where innocent Americans were killed by Muslim terrorists. If 9/11 were the work of Irish terrorists, building an Irish pub there would be in poor taste for the same reason.

Link:
Clarification

No responses yet

Older posts »