Are Congo Rape Victims More Important than Mutilated Muslim Women?

Sep 11 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections

Muslim Victim of Islamic Mutilation Congo Rape Victim Radical feminists place human rights violations against women on a Caste System, making Congo rape victims more important than mutilated Muslim women. Despite documented mutilations against Muslim women, African women are leftist’s violated favorites. Victimized Muslim women only gain status and support from Feminazis  when it helps glamourize anti-war/anti-capitalist/anti-American causes . Even then, they are viewed as nothing more than the creation of George W. Bush. African and Muslim women are brutally violated.  Congo war lords use rape as the suppressive “weapon of choice.”  Islamic men use mutilation as the weapon of control. Women in Islamic countries are committing suicide in record numbers , because “ Sharia never abolished slavery, sexual slavery and highly regulates it .”  Congo rape is not abolished, yet Femifascists are on the warpath to end it, while disregarding Islamic mutialtion as western propaganda. On August 10, 2010, Salon.com’s Judy Mandelbaum chastized Time Magazine for its cover photo of a mutilated Afghan woman.  Her nose had been cut off by a male family member who punished her for misbehaving.  Mandelbauam called Time ‘s cover “the oldest trick in the propagandist’s playbook,” stating: …another candidate for the next Time cover could be an image of one of the growing number of Afghan women who are taking their own lives… Salon’s Tracey Clarke-Flory followed up on Mandelbaum’s story , agreeing: Time used the photo as propaganda to “stir up”  “emotions” in order to keep the war going: …this [mutilation] is after nine years of America’s presence. In fact, Time Magazine’s cover girl was brutalized after eight years of U.S. occupation. Stories like this one stir up strong emotions and righteous outrage… they inspire anxiety in me about Afghanistan’s women being used as propaganda. Middle Eastern Muslim women ( and Europe ) should forget receiving human and civil rights help from Feminazis : learn to live with your mutilated faces and bodies unless you’re from the glamorous Congo. Radical feminists are using journalism to do what they accused Time of doing: exploit Congo rape violations.

Link:
Are Congo Rape Victims More Important than Mutilated Muslim Women?

No responses yet

Muslim Persecution of Hindus In India — The Story You Won’t See In the Western Mainstream Media

Sep 10 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections

They are crossing the border illegally and violently displacing the indigenous population whose homes and possessions they either destroy or occupy. They are attacking the young, the elderly, and especially the girls and women, whom they kidnap, forcibly convert, or traffic into brothels. The locals are terrified of them. The police rarely come to their aid, nor do the politically correct media or government. Both are terrified by the criminals and terrorists who are riding these immigrant waves. I am not talking about illegal immigrants to Europe or North America. I am describing Muslims who are penetrating India’s West Bengal region. These Bangladeshi immigrants are becoming conduits for criminal activities (arms, drugs, and sexual slavery) which also fund global jihad. You won’t read about this in the Western mainstream media—or even in the Indian media, which has turned a blind eye to this ongoing tragedy because they are afraid to be labeled “politically incorrect” or “Islamophobic.” They are also afraid of reprisals. When Islamic zealots ransacked the office of the renowned newspaper, ‘The Statesman’ in Kolkata, in retaliation for a mere reproduction of an article condemning Islamic extremism, the Indian press remained silent. The editor and publisher of the newspaper were arrested for offending Muslim sentiments and no action was taken against the rioters. Read the Rest at Fox News

See the rest here:
Muslim Persecution of Hindus In India — The Story You Won’t See In the Western Mainstream Media

No responses yet

Drop the Jihad Plans, Florida ‘Pastor’ Changes Mind on Koran Burning – For Now

Sep 10 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections

I'm sure they'll find another reason to strap on some bombs. I wonder how much attention I could muster up if I announced my church would be burning some Korans.  A cranky and crazy old guy in Florida with about 50 followers was able to get the focus of the world by saying he would take torches to the Muslim holy book on 9/11.  Politicians cringed and terrorists strapped explosives to their underwear.  But at the last minute the so-called pastor of Dover Outreach Center has possibly changed his mind. When the story of Pastor Terry Jones torching Korans first broke, few folks covered it except some leftist blogs scouring news-wires for examples of Islamaphobia.  This story was ideal in that the book burners could be identified with anyone against the Ground Zero mosque.  I wrote extensively on the issue over 6 weeks ago.  (See that article here .)  As more and more people began to discover the story it became a national concern and an international story.  Would this ‘church’ burn the Korans and what would be the reaction by terrorists? This week warnings from General Petraeus, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton , and other leaders were sent out.  Clinton even asked the media not to cover the holy book torching as an act of patriotism.  There was a real concern that such an incident would lead to greater attacks on US soldiers and citizens abroad.  Secretary of Defense Robert Gates called Jones on Thursday asking him to throw away the matches.  Even President Obama felt it was necessary to speak up. “This is a recruitment bonanza for al-Qaida.  You could have serious violence in places like Pakistan or Afghanistan.  This could increase the recruitment of individuals who would be willing to blow themselves up in American cities or European cities.” – President Obama Suprisingly, Terry Jones announced to the press on Thursday that they will not burn the Korans, because they have a promise from Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf to move the Park51 mosque further away from Ground Zero. “The Imam has agreed to move the mosque.  We have agreed to cancel our event on Saturday, and on Saturday I will be flying up there to meet with him.” – Terry Jones The problem is that Imam Rauf’s office responded by saying they made no such promise.

Follow this link:
Drop the Jihad Plans, Florida ‘Pastor’ Changes Mind on Koran Burning – For Now

No responses yet

Pastor cancels Quran-burning, then reconsiders (Antonio Gonzalez/Associated Press)

Sep 10 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections

Antonio Gonzalez / Associated Press : Pastor cancels Quran-burning, then reconsiders

No responses yet

Field of Nightmares

Sep 09 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections

The imam behind the proposed Ground Zero Mosque had a not so veiled threat for those against the mosque. I quote: “The headlines in the Muslim world will be that Islam is under attack,” “…if you don’t do this right, anger will explode in the Muslim world,” …. predicting that the reaction could be more furious than the eruption of violence following the 2005 publication of Danish cartoons…. More….

Go here to read the rest:
Field of Nightmares

No responses yet

Global Insider: The Developing 8

Sep 09 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections

Leaders from Egypt, Iran, Bangladesh, Nigeria, Indonesia, Malaysia, Pakistan, and Turkey attended a Developing 8 summit in Abuja, Nigeria in July. In an e-mail interview, Gareth Jenkins , Istanbul-based analyst and author of ” Political Islam in Turkey: Running West, Heading East? “, explains the background and current state of the D-8. WPR: What is the historic background and focus of the Developing 8, and how is it evolving? Gareth Jenkins: The Developing 8 (D-8) was founded on June 15, 1997, in Istanbul. It was the brainchild of Necmettin Erbakan, modern Turkey’s first Islamist prime minister, who wanted to create a Muslim alternative to what was then the Group of Seven (G-7) of leading industrialized nations, later to become the G-8. The eight founding members were Bangladesh, Egypt, Indonesia, Iran, Malaysia, Nigeria, Pakistan and Turkey. Although the D-8 is theoretically open to new members, no other countries have applied to join. One of the main restraints on the development of the D-8 is that its members are widely dispersed and relatively poor, with limited transportation links. Most are not “natural” economic partners and their most important economic relationships — whether for trade or in other areas such as Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) — are with countries or economic blocs (such as the EU) that are not members of the organization. The D-8 members tend to give priority to developing and maintaining these relationships rather than to ties with other D-8 states. WPR:What impact has it had on economic and political ties between member states? Jenkins: The D-8 organizes heads of state summit meetings once every two years, in addition to more frequent conferences, seminars and working groups on specific sectors and issues. Although the D-8 has not established itself as a global player in its own right, these regular contacts have strengthened bilateral economic cooperation between member states, even if the overall impact remains relatively limited. According to the organization’s own figures, intra-member trade currently accounts for an average of 4.3 percent of individual members’ total foreign trade. The highest proportion is in Pakistan, for whom trade with other D-8 members accounts for 8.3 percent of its total foreign trade. On May 14, 2006, all of the member states except Bangladesh signed a Preferential Trade Agreement (PTA), which foresees reducing tariffs on the trade of specific goods. However, implementation is proving problematic. It is currently unclear whether either the PTA or other more ambitious proposals — such as free trade and visa-free travel between member states — will ever be realized. WPR: Does it have the potential to play a larger role in the global multilateral framework? Jenkins: There currently appears little prospect of the D-8 becoming a global player in its own right. Most members tend to look to membership of regional groupings or more powerful multilateral organizations as more effective means of exerting global influence. For example, Indonesia and Turkey are both members of the G-20, and appear to regard it as being a more effective global player than the D-8. Together with Iran, Turkey has always been one of the two most-active members of the D-8 (the D-8 Secretariat has been based in Istanbul since its inception). But, in June 2010, Turkey announced plans for an alternative Muslim economic bloc including the countries of North Africa and the Middle East.

Read more here:
Global Insider: The Developing 8

No responses yet

A Few Dollars More

Sep 08 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections, Senate

So Obama is asking to spend $50 billion more to get the economy going . So I guess the last trillion he spent didn’t do anything, but this next $50 billion is totally going to fix the economy. So who is actually dumb enough to believe Obama any idea whatsoever of how to help the economy? I think much more disturbing than the number of people who think Obama is Muslim is the number of people who still think he’s competent. This is why we need the “Party of No” in power — or better yet, the Party of “Shut up, stupid!” If the Republicans controlled both the House and Senate, then anytime Obama proposed some idiotic new idea, the Republicans would just say, “Shut up, stupid!” and that would be the end of it. I don’t know why Democrats thought branding the Republicans the “Party of No” would hurt them. Doing nothing doesn’t cost anything.

See more here:
A Few Dollars More

No responses yet

New York Times Links Opposition To Ground Zero Mosque To Vandalism And Violence

Sep 07 2010 Published by under 2010 Elections

First the New York Time s ran front page  puff pieces on the leaders of the Ground Zero mega-mosque complex (now known as Park51 ). Yesterday, the Times went a step further. It ran a front page article lamenting the persecution of Muslim Americans, which it blamed in part on the fierce opposition to a Muslim cultural center near ground zero that has unleashed a torrent of anti-Muslim sentiments and a spate of vandalism. The knifing of a Muslim cab driver in New York City has also alarmed many American Muslims…The great mosque debate seems to have unleashed a flurry of vandalism and harassment directed at mosques To dramatize its point, the Times quoted a Muslim chaplain at Duke University, who said: Some of what people are saying in this mosque controversy is very similar to what German media was saying about Jews in the 1920s and 1930s. It’s really scary. Aside from the obscene moral equivalency of comparing the opposition to the particular placement of one specific mosque complex with questionable connections near Ground Zero to the widespread German hatred and violence against Jews simply because they were Jews, the Times article overlooks one revealing fact. Reported hate crimes in the United States connected with the religion of the victims have been directed at Jews more than five times as much as the number of similar crimes directed at Muslims. Undaunted by the facts, the Times article tried to paint a picture of Muslim Americans cowering in their living rooms: Muslims sit in their living rooms, aghast as pundits assert over and over that Islam is not a religion at all but a political cult, that Muslims cannot be good Americans and that mosques are fronts for extremist jihadis. What Islamic organization does the Times then cite as trying to address the “growing tide of fear and intolerance?” None other than the unindicted co-conspirator of the terrorist-funding Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development -  the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA)! One month after 9/11, Dr. Ingrid Mattson , ISNA’s president, described the extremist Wahhabism ideology that inspired the 9/11 terrorists this way: It is the name of a reform movement that began 200 years ago to rid Islamic societies of cultural practices and rigid interpretation that had acquired over the centuries. It really was analogous to the European Protestant Reformation. In a September 2002 interview with PBS , Mattson stated that she did not see “any difference” between Christian leaders criticizing Islam or Al Qaeda on the one hand, and Osama bin Laden citing “Islamic theology to justify violence against Americans” on the other. Memo to the Times : Check your facts. Neither ISNA nor the Park 51 Imam Faisal Abdul Rauf are moderates in any true sense of the word. They believe in the supremacy of sharia (Islamic law) and in stealth methods to incorporate sharia into American society. They blame America as at least an “accessory” to 9/11. Muslim Americans who are truly concerned about intolerance in this country should start with the practitioners of intolerance in the Muslim American community itself. – Joseph Klein is the author of a new book entitled Lethal Engagement: Barack Hussein Obama, the United Nations and Radical Islam , which is available now for pre-order on Amazon.com.

Link:
New York Times Links Opposition To Ground Zero Mosque To Vandalism And Violence

No responses yet

« Newer posts Older posts »